In our quest for justice, the notion of absolute justice often emerges as a pivotal point of discussion. Absolute justice is the idea of a perfect and complete form of justice, untouched by any form of injustice. The transcribed content delves into this concept, questioning whether absolute justice is ever truly practiced on Earth. The dialogue suggests that we are innately inclined to believe in justice, as even young children can discern the difference between what is just and unjust. However, the reality of our world often presents scenarios where justice appears elusive, especially for those who have been oppressed or wronged.

A striking example presented in the transcription is the case of a mass murderer in Norway, whose prison conditions sparked controversy. This individual, responsible for the deaths of many, is said to reside in a facility that provides amenities like a gym, internet, and even a PlayStation. Such circumstances raise questions about the justice system’s ability to adequately address heinous crimes. The fact that this individual reportedly won a lawsuit over being served cold coffee, receiving a significant financial compensation while incarcerated, further complicates the public perception of justice. This case highlights the discrepancies between societal expectations of justice and the legal systems in place.

The dialogue further explores the idea that if absolute justice is not realized in this life, it must exist elsewhere, perhaps in an afterlife. This belief is anchored in religious texts like the Quran, which offer the promise of divine justice beyond our earthly existence. The speaker emphasizes the Quran’s role in providing guidance and prophesizing events that have come true, thereby asserting its divine origin. This perspective suggests that while human systems may fail to deliver absolute justice, a higher power ensures that justice will ultimately prevail.

In contemplating the origins of the universe and life itself, the transcription touches upon philosophical and theological arguments. The discussion challenges the notion that the universe could arise from nothing, proposing instead that an eternal and self-sufficient entity, often identified as God, must have initiated creation. This argument aligns with the beliefs of many religious traditions, which posit that a divine presence governs the cosmos and upholds justice.

The conversation concludes with a call to action for individuals to reconnect with their faith and uphold their beliefs in everyday life. For many, this involves adhering to religious practices and principles, which are seen as pathways to achieving personal and spiritual fulfillment. Emphasizing the importance of maintaining one’s religious identity, the dialogue encourages individuals to seek guidance and support from their communities, reaffirming their place within a larger, faith-based narrative that promises justice beyond our temporal existence.